Brand Compare Phone Finder
<$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $800 $1000 $1200+

Compare Phones

ZTE Blade A51

ZTE Blade A51

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

Price (USD) $66.67 $507.90
Network
Technology GSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
2G bands GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
Speed HSPA, LTE HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G
GPRS Yes -
EDGE Yes -
5G bands - 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
Launch
Announced 2021, May 08 2024, January 17
Status Available. Released 2021, May 08 Available. Released 2024, January 24
Body
Dimensions 166.5 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.56 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in)
Weight 173.7 g (6.14 oz) 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz)
SIM Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN
Build - Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2)
Features - IP68 dust tight and water resistant (immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro)
Display
Type IPS LCD Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak)
Size 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density)
Display 6.52″ 1080×2340 pixels -
Protection - Corning Gorilla Armor
Features - DX anti-reflective coating
Platform
OS Android 11 (Go edition) Android 14, up to 7 major OS updates, One UI 8.5
Chipset Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU IMG8322 Adreno 750 (1 GHz)
Memory
Card slot microSDXC No
Internal 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM 32/64GB 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM
Features eMMC 5.1 UFS 4.0
RAM 2GB -
Main Camera
Dual 13 MP, AF 2 MP -
Features LED flash, HDR Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama
Video 1080p@30fps 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS
Quad - 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video
Selfie camera
Single 5 MP 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF
Features - HDR, HDR10+
Video - 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes Yes, with stereo speakers
3.5mm jack Yes No
Features - High-bitrate audio support
Comms
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
Positioning GPS, GLONASS Yes, with A-GPS GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
NFC Yes Yes
Radio FM radio Yes No
USB USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG
Features
Sensors Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Messaging SMS(threaded view), MMS, Email, IM -
Browser HTML5 -
Features - Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support
Battery
Type Li-Ion 3200 mAh Li-Ion 5000 mAh
Charging - 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless
Misc
Colors Blue, Gray Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange
Price - $ 507.90 / € 573.22 / £ 494.00 / ₹ 104,999
Expected price - -
Alert types Vibration, MP3, WAV ringtones -
Java No -
Made by China -
Release date 2021, May -
Models - SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS
SAR - 1.26 W/kg (head)     0.62 W/kg (body)
SAR EU - 1.06 W/kg (head)     1.30 W/kg (body)
Our Tests
Performance - AnTuTu: 1453497 (v9), 1823822 (v10) GeekBench: 7076 (v6) 3DMark: 4983 (Wild Life Extreme)
Display - 1447 nits max brightness (measured)
Camera - Photo / Video
Loudspeaker - -24.6 LUFS (Very good)
Battery - Active use score 13:49h
ZTE Blade A51
2 category wins
Budget segment
VS
Our Winner

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
6 category wins
Upper Mid segment
Head-to-Head Breakdown
— Performance Win
— Display Win
— Camera Win
— Battery Win
— Charging Win
Win RAM —
— 5G Win
Win Price —
ZTE Blade A51 — Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3.5mm analog headphone jack for lag-free wired audio listening
Cons
  • Limited to 4G LTE cellular data speeds without 5G support
  • IPS LCD screen lacks the deep contrast and saturation of Galaxy S24 Ultra's OLED
  • Screen refresh rate capped at 60Hz (less fluid than Galaxy S24 Ultra's 120Hz)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Future-proof 5G network connectivity (limited to 4G on Blade A51)
  • Adaptive LTPO display technology optimizing power efficiency
  • Fluid 120Hz refresh rate providing much smoother motion than Blade A51's 60Hz
  • Higher-tier Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) processor offering substantial compute superiority
  • Dedicated telephoto optical zoom lens for crisp distant shots (missing on Blade A51)
Cons
  • Lacks 3.5mm headphone jack (available on Blade A51)
Our Verdict

This head-to-head comparison between the ZTE Blade A51 and Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra pits two competitive offerings against each other to evaluate performance ceilings, display prowess, and stamina.

Processing horsepower tilts convincingly toward the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, driven by its Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm). It outpaces the Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) in the ZTE Blade A51 during resource-demanding workflows, offering greater headroom for complex gaming, video encoding, and rapid app switching.

Visual fidelity favors the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, whose LTPO AMOLED display at 120Hz delivers enhanced sharpness, rich color depth, and fluid motion that outclasses the IPS LCD screen found on the ZTE Blade A51.

Imaging capabilities tilt toward the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, highlighted by its 200MP primary camera with OIS stabilization and optical zoom capabilities. It produces crisper snapshots with lively color science and cleaner edge definition compared to the 13MP camera on the ZTE Blade A51.

Longevity and replenishment turnaround favor the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, whose 5000mAh battery and 45W charging provide faster top-ups and reliable stamina compared to the 3200mAh (standard) configuration of the ZTE Blade A51.

Overall Verdict: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra earns the victory in this head-to-head comparison with 6 category wins versus 2 for the ZTE Blade A51. With decisive strengths in key hardware areas, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra delivers greater overall capability and stronger value.