Compare Phones
Search and select devices to compare
 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro |
 Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
|
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $300.00 | $507.90 |
| Network | ||
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - cellular model only | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - cellular model only | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 71 SA/NSA - cellular model only | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | 2025, September 24 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 24 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
| Dimensions | 279.8 x 181.7 x 7.5 mm (11.02 x 7.15 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| Weight | 600 / 610 / 620 g (1.32 lb) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - cellular model only · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - cellular model only | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Features | Stylus support (magnetic) IP53 dust protected and water resistant (vertical water sprays) | IP68 dust tight and water resistant (immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) |
| Display | ||
| Type | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 600 nits (HBM) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Size | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Features | Matte glass (optional) | DX anti-reflective coating |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, up to 7 major OS updates, One UI 8.5 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| GPU | Adreno 810 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| Memory | ||
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Features | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Main Camera | ||
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - Wi-Fi model 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF - 5G model | - |
| Selfie camera | ||
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Features | - | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Features | 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio | High-bitrate audio support |
| Comms | ||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS (B1I + B1C), QZSS - cellular model only | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass, gyro (cellular model only) | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Features | - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support |
| Battery | ||
| Type | 12000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 27W reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Misc | ||
| Colors | Graphite Gray, Silver, Lavender Purple, Matte Glass Version | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | 25099RP13G, 2509BRP2DG | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 507.90 / € 573.22 / £ 494.00 / ₹ 104,999 |
| Our Tests | ||
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1453497 (v9), 1823822 (v10) GeekBench: 7076 (v6) 3DMark: 4983 (Wild Life Extreme) |
| Display | - | 1447 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Battery | Active use score 12:55h | Active use score 13:49h |
| EU LABEL | ||
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Battery | 103:18h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
2 category wins
Upper Mid segment
VS
Our Winner
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
4 category wins
Upper Mid segment
Head-to-Head Breakdown
| — | Performance | Win |
| — | Display | Win |
| — | Camera | Win |
| Win | Battery | — |
| — | Charging | Win |
| — | RAM | — |
| — | 5G | — |
| Win | Price | — |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro — Pros & Cons
Pros
- Larger 12000mAh battery reservoir (7000mAh more capacity than Galaxy S24 Ultra)
- 3.5mm analog headphone jack for lag-free wired audio listening
Cons
- IPS LCD screen lacks the deep contrast and saturation of Galaxy S24 Ultra's OLED
- Lower primary camera resolution (8MP vs 200MP on Galaxy S24 Ultra)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra — Pros & Cons
Pros
- Adaptive LTPO display technology optimizing power efficiency
- Higher-tier Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) processor offering substantial compute superiority
- Dedicated telephoto optical zoom lens for crisp distant shots (missing on Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for superior low-light and steady video
- Higher-resolution 200MP main camera (192MP advantage vs Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
Cons
- Smaller 5000mAh battery capacity (-7000mAh deficit vs Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
- Lacks 3.5mm headphone jack (available on Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
Our Verdict
In this in-depth comparative analysis, we place the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro directly against the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra to identify where each hardware architecture excels and which device delivers the smarter investment.
Processing horsepower tilts convincingly toward the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, driven by its Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm). It outpaces the Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4 nm) in the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro during resource-demanding workflows, offering greater headroom for complex gaming, video encoding, and rapid app switching.
Visual fidelity favors the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, whose LTPO AMOLED display at 120Hz delivers enhanced sharpness, rich color depth, and fluid motion that outclasses the IPS LCD screen at 120Hz found on the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro.
Imaging capabilities tilt toward the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, highlighted by its 200MP primary camera with OIS stabilization and optical zoom capabilities. It produces crisper snapshots with lively color science and cleaner edge definition compared to the 8MP camera on the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro.
Power endurance and charging turnaround lean toward the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro, pairing a 12000mAh battery with 33W recharging to ensure lower downtime between intensive usage cycles compared to 5000mAh (45W) on the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.
Overall Verdict: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra earns the victory in this head-to-head comparison with 4 category wins versus 2 for the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro. With decisive strengths in key hardware areas, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra delivers greater overall capability and stronger value.
Trending Posts
Apple Announces New AI Features for iOS 20
Jan 18, 2026
New Release: Infinix Note 60 Ultra Specs & Price
Mar 21, 2026
New Release: Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Specs & Price
Mar 19, 2026