Compare Phones
Search and select devices to compare
 Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
 Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $507.90 | $300.00 |
| Network | ||
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - cellular model only |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - cellular model only |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - cellular model only |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 71 SA/NSA - cellular model only |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | 2024, January 17 | 2025, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 24 | Available. Released 2025, September 24 |
| Body | ||
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) | 279.8 x 181.7 x 7.5 mm (11.02 x 7.15 x 0.30 in) |
| Weight | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) | 600 / 610 / 620 g (1.32 lb) |
| Build | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - cellular model only · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - cellular model only |
| Features | IP68 dust tight and water resistant (immersible up to 1.5m for 30 min) Stylus (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) | Stylus support (magnetic) IP53 dust protected and water resistant (vertical water sprays) |
| Display | ||
| Type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 600 nits (HBM) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Armor | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Features | DX anti-reflective coating | Matte glass (optional) |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android 14, up to 7 major OS updates, One UI 8.5 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| CPU | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) | Adreno 810 |
| Memory | ||
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Features | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera | ||
| Quad | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video | - |
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - Wi-Fi model 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, AF - 5G model |
| Selfie camera | ||
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR, HDR10+ | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| Features | High-bitrate audio support | 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio |
| Comms | ||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS (B1I + B1C), QZSS - cellular model only |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass, gyro (cellular model only) |
| Features | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | - |
| Battery | ||
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 27W reverse wired |
| Misc | ||
| Colors | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange | Graphite Gray, Silver, Lavender Purple, Matte Glass Version |
| Models | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS | 25099RP13G, 2509BRP2DG |
| SAR | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) | - |
| Price | $ 507.90 / € 573.22 / £ 494.00 / ₹ 104,999 | About 300 EUR |
| Our Tests | ||
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1453497 (v9), 1823822 (v10) GeekBench: 7076 (v6) 3DMark: 4983 (Wild Life Extreme) | - |
| Display | 1447 nits max brightness (measured) | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Battery | Active use score 13:49h | Active use score 12:55h |
| EU LABEL | ||
| Energy | - | Class G |
| Battery | - | 103:18h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Free fall | - | Class A (208 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
| Win | Performance | — |
| Win | Display | — |
| Win | Camera | — |
| — | Battery | Win |
| Win | Charging | — |
| — | RAM | — |
| — | 5G | — |
| — | Price | Win |
- Adaptive LTPO display technology optimizing power efficiency
- Higher-tier Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) processor offering substantial compute superiority
- Dedicated telephoto optical zoom lens for crisp distant shots (missing on Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for superior low-light and steady video
- Higher-resolution 200MP main camera (192MP advantage vs Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
- Smaller 5000mAh battery capacity (-7000mAh deficit vs Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
- Lacks 3.5mm headphone jack (available on Redmi Pad 2 Pro)
- Larger 12000mAh battery reservoir (7000mAh more capacity than Galaxy S24 Ultra)
- 3.5mm analog headphone jack for lag-free wired audio listening
- IPS LCD screen lacks the deep contrast and saturation of Galaxy S24 Ultra's OLED
- Lower primary camera resolution (8MP vs 200MP on Galaxy S24 Ultra)
Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro requires looking past basic marketing sheets to examine real-world compute efficiency, visual fidelity, and daily ergonomics.
In terms of compute horsepower and raw silicon throughput, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra commands an evident lead with its Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) architecture. Heavy multitasking, high-framerate 3D graphics, and sustained processor-intensive applications operate with smoother frame rates and superior thermal composure compared to the Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (4 nm) inside the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro.
On the visual front, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra establishes an advantage with its vibrant LTPO AMOLED panel at 120Hz. It yields richer saturation, deeper contrast ratios, and superior outdoor sunlight legibility compared to the IPS LCD display at 120Hz on the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro.
Photographic versatility is led by the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. Its 200MP primary setup with OIS stabilization and dedicated optical zoom versatility captures superior dynamic range, sharper micro-textures, and more dependable low-light exposures than the 8MP setup on the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro.
Power endurance and charging turnaround lean toward the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, pairing a 5000mAh battery with 45W recharging to ensure lower downtime between intensive usage cycles compared to 12000mAh (33W) on the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro.
Overall Verdict: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra emerges as our recommended champion in this matchup, clinching 4 category wins against 2 for the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro. Users seeking superior overall balance, higher-tier performance, and refined hardware polish will find the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra to be the more complete package.
